Given the benefits, why is it that financial modelling is such a potential minefield? The risks are considerable, hence the importance of applying the appropriate care and skill in the performance of modelling assignments.
The risks associated with financial models in the corporate decision-making realm are analogous to software application development. Would you purchase a significant software application without being confident that it had been properly designed and thoroughly tested?
In business and financial modelling, users often create applications with no planning, structuring, testing or quality control. Without these basic fundamentals the risk of inappropriate, inaccurate and unreliable analysis increases exponentially.
These risks are a reality as evidenced by a number of high profile disasters in the last few years. Studies undertaken prior to 1997 indicate error rates of approximately 21%; however, studies from 1997 onwards indicate error rates have increased to an average of 91% of the 54 models reviewed.
Our experience is that the these increasing error rates are primarily linked to:
- rapid growth in the usage of spreadsheets within the
corporate and public sectors, without suitable modelling
best practice training and risk management procedures;
- the fact that training is provided for spreadsheet
applications, but not in the techniques of spreadsheet
development for decision-making;
- increasing complexity of the decisions being evaluated with
spreadsheets;
- advances in spreadsheet functionality and the inherent
flexibility of spreadsheet applications;
- a lack of discipline in design, development and testing of
spreadsheet models.